Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services · California

Computer Protection Technology, Inc

Escondido, CA · ~20 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Computer Protection Technology, Inc runs at 255% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Computer Protection Technology, Inc: 5.4 TCR = 255% of Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Computer Protection Technology, Inc safety composite

Computer Protection Technology, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.8

2017→2021

Computer Protection Technology, Inc injury rate improved

Computer Protection Technology, Inc's TCR fell 8.8 from 13.5 in 2017 to 4.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.5 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Escondido, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.4 · 255% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #112/148
  • PHOTO Cascade Plating & Ma…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cascade Plating & Machine, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Computer Protection Technology, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Computer Protection Technology, Inc averages 5.4 TCR (255% of the Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Computer Protection Technology, Inc TCR series: 2017=13.5 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.8 · BLS 2.1

Where Computer Protection Technology, Inc falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial and industrial mach establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #112 safest of 148 Commercial and industrial mach employers in California.

Computer Protection Technology, Inc (20 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Computer Protection Technology, Inc
Computer Protection Technology, Inc (20 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Computer Protection Technology, Inc has fewer employees than the Commercial and industrial machinery repa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2018 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2017 13.5 9.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · CA · Escondido

2,560 Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 244 employers in Escondido, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cascade Plating & Machine, LLC 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PepsiCo - Las Vegas Certified Center - Grayhawk Leasing, LLC 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR LAS VEGAS CERTIFIED CENTER 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Lift Trucks Boston 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sills Farms, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE F A Maggiore & Sons, LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE CALMEX CONTRACTING INC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Velvet Antler Ranch LLC 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA Escondido 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palomar Medical Center Escondido 3,031 FTE
CITY-NEAR Escondido CA 1,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bergelectric Corp. CA 1,279 FTE
NAT-TCR Kittanning Care Center 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR DPN 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Univ of SC Beaufort 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 074/Lanham 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Division JV16 - Wright-Patterson AFB Fuels 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Traverse City 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homer Environmental, LLC 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE CH 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.