Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · South Carolina

Concept Packaging Charleston

Name: Concept Packaging Charleston Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

N Charleston, SC · ~68 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 0.0
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Concept Packaging Charleston runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

Concept Packaging Charleston: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Concept Packaging Charleston safety composite

Concept Packaging Charleston scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Concept Packaging Charleston held a steady TCR band

Concept Packaging Charleston's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.0 TCR.

2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · N Charleston, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #0/23
PHOTO Menasha Corporation …
BOOK 2y book
INJ 0 inj
SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Menasha Corporation Headquarters (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Menasha Packag

0.2
Menasha Corpor

0.1
Green Bay Pack

0.1
ATLANTA FULFIL

0.1
This site

0

What this shows Concept Packaging Charleston averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Concept Packaging Charleston TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Concept Packaging Charleston falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 23 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in South Carolina.

Concept Packaging Charleston (68 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Concept Packaging Charleston has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2024	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2023	0.0	0.0	0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · SC · N Charleston

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 21 employers in N Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Menasha Corporation Headquarters	NEENAH, WI	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Green Bay Packaging Shipping Container	GREEN BAY, WI	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	ATLANTA FULFILLMENT	ATLANTA, GA	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Menasha Packaging Company - North Office	NEENAH, WI	0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	COPE GENERATING PLANT	COPE	68 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Northern Power Delivery (Columbia)	WEST COLUMBIA	68 FTE
STATE-SIZE	DRB Group South Carolina, LLC- Greenville	GREENVILLE	68 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Greenville/Ashville	GREER	68 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Unit # 0739	N Charleston	126 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Unit #0739	N Charleston	88 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Charleston, SC HVAC	N Charleston	85 FTE
CITY-NEAR	44551D - CHARLESTON PEC	N Charleston	72 FTE
NAT-TCR	Monster Energy Company 2535 Anselmo Dr	Corona, CA	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Koeze Company	Grand Rapids, MI	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Point32Health Providence	Providence, RI	0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Point32Health Quincy	Quincy, MA	0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Cattlemens 09	Rancho Cordova, CA	68 FTE
NAT-SIZE	NorthStar Construction Services	Shirley, MA	68 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Valley Oak Labor Service	Exeter, CA	68 FTE
NAT-SIZE	HORIBA Instruments Incorporated - Medical	9755 Research Drive, CA	68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.