Millwork, custom architectural, manufacturing · Colorado

Concepts in Millwork, Inc.

Colorado Springs, CO · ~93 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Concepts in Millwork, Inc. runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Millwork, custom architectural, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Concepts in Millwork, Inc.: 5.5 TCR = 166% of Millwork, custom architectural, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Concepts in Millwork, Inc. safety composite

Concepts in Millwork, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2018→2024

Concepts in Millwork, Inc. injury rate improved

Concepts in Millwork, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.4 from 9.3 in 2018 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.3 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=4.1 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337212 · Colorado Springs, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 166% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #7/11
  • PHOTO Handcraft Woodworkin…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Handcraft Woodworking, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Concepts in Millwork, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Concepts in Millwork, Inc. averages 5.5 TCR (166% of the Millwork, custom architectural, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Concepts in Millwork, Inc. TCR series: 2018=9.3 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=4.1 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Concepts in Millwork, Inc. falls in its industry

371 Millwork, custom architectural establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 11 Millwork, custom architectural employers in Colorado.

Concepts in Millwork, Inc. (93 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Concepts in Millwork, Inc.
Concepts in Millwork, Inc. (93 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Concepts in Millwork, Inc. has more employees than the Millwork, custom architectural, manufact median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2023 5.7 1.1 5 0 0
2022 4.3 2.1 4 0 0
2020 4.1 3.0 4 0 0
2019 5.5 5.5 5 0 0
2018 9.3 4.2 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337212 · CO · Colorado Springs

371 Millwork, custom architectural, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Handcraft Woodworking, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Neumann Co., Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lange Bros. Woodwork Co., Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Herrick & White, Ltd. 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Big Johnson Construction 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dutch's Masonry 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Architectural Concepts 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE LEI Companies, Inc. HQ 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Terre Haute 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Dallas, TX H&C 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Alan Vander Horst 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Super Giant Carlisle Store 6457 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lawrence Equipment Banning 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suncrest Gardens 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avista Spokane Valley 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nashville, TN 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.