Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing · Michigan

Concord Tool And Manufacturing, Inc.

Mount Clemens, MI · ~273 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Concord Tool And Manufacturing, Inc. runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Concord Tool And Manufacturing, Inc.: 4.0 TCR = 74% of Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Concord Tool And Manufacturing, Inc. safety composite

Concord Tool And Manufacturing, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2022→2024

Concord Tool And Manufacturing, Inc. injury rate improved

Concord Tool And Manufacturing, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.8 from 4.9 in 2022 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.9 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Mount Clemens, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.0 · 74% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #57/165
  • PHOTO Profile Metal Formin…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~273 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Profile Metal Forming TN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Concord Tool And Manufacturing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Concord Tool And Manufacturing, Inc. averages 4.0 TCR (74% of the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Concord Tool And Manufacturing, Inc. TCR series: 2022=4.9 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 5.4

Where Concord Tool And Manufacturing, Inc. falls in its industry

510 Job stampings, automotive, met establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 165 Job stampings, automotive, met employers in Michigan.

Concord Tool And Manufacturing, Inc. (273 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Concord Tool And Manufacturing, Inc.
Concord Tool And Manufacturing, Inc. (273 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Concord Tool And Manufacturing, Inc. has more employees than the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 2.4 9 0 0
2022 4.9 3.7 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · MI · Mount Clemens

510 Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 18 employers in Mount Clemens, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Profile Metal Forming TN 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wegmann Automotive USA, Inc - TN 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Motors Marion Stamping 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shelby 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Detroit Housing & Revitalization Department 273 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kraft Heinz Company - Holland, MI 273 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooper Standard-Oscoda Plant 273 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASMO Michigan 273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Macomb County 2,773 FTE
CITY-NEAR Macomb County Human Services Board an Agency of Macomb County Martha T Berry MCF 302 FTE
CITY-NEAR Concord Tool & Manufacturing 238 FTE
CITY-NEAR 256410-MOUNT CLEMENS PO 182 FTE
NAT-TCR HORMIGUEROS 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Streamline Precision LLC 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 094 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Coventry Village 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Salt Lake City, UT 273 FTE
NAT-SIZE OK - Google 273 FTE
NAT-SIZE DotHouse Health 273 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frantz Wholesale Nursery LLC 273 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.