Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) · Indiana

Concordia Lutheran High School

Ft Wayne, IN · ~21 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Concordia Lutheran High School runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) workplace, earning a grade C.

Concordia Lutheran High School: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Concordia Lutheran High School safety composite

Concordia Lutheran High School scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Concordia Lutheran High School held a steady TCR band

Concordia Lutheran High School's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Ft Wayne, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/168
  • PHOTO Barclay's Whippany
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Barclay's Whippany (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Concordia Lutheran High School in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Concordia Lutheran High School averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Concordia Lutheran High School TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Concordia Lutheran High School falls in its industry

6,952 Cafeteria food services contra establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 168 Cafeteria food services contra employers in Indiana.

Concordia Lutheran High School (21 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Concordia Lutheran High School
Concordia Lutheran High School (21 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Concordia Lutheran High School has fewer employees than the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · IN · Ft Wayne

6,952 Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 33 employers in Ft Wayne, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Barclay's Whippany 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MOREHOUSE COLLEGE 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT BLOOMBERG 731 LEX PANTRY 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT GRAMBLING RESIDENT DINING 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Applied Fabricators 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Refuse Department 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4535-0357 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store 0431 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR FWMRPC (all) 1,121 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Wayne Headquarters 573 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Wayne One Summit Square 211 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Wayne Bakery 204 FTE
NAT-TCR Aviation Other : Virtual Employee Roll-Up Site 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AZ-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4006 Mt. Aloysius College 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0774 - Albuquerque-Central, Nm 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0744 - Jasper, Al 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0725 - Easton, Pa 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.