Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Pennsylvania

Concrete Cutting Systems, Inc.

Philadelphia, PA · ~73 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Concrete Cutting Systems, Inc. runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Concrete Cutting Systems, Inc.: 0.7 TCR = 26% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Concrete Cutting Systems, Inc. safety composite

Concrete Cutting Systems, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Concrete Cutting Systems, Inc.: 0.0 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 1.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2022

Concrete Cutting Systems, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.5 from 0.0 in 2021 to 1.5 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Philadelphia, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 26% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #2/54
  • PHOTO Thorstad Companies
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Thorstad Companies (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Concrete Cutting Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Concrete Cutting Systems, Inc. averages 0.7 TCR (26% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Concrete Cutting Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=1.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Concrete Cutting Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 54 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Pennsylvania.

Concrete Cutting Systems, Inc. (73 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Concrete Cutting Systems, Inc.
Concrete Cutting Systems, Inc. (73 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Concrete Cutting Systems, Inc. has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.5 1.5 0 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · PA · Philadelphia

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Thorstad Companies 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SLR COMMUNICATIONS 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MFM Contracting Corp 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Utilities Park water 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE McMurray Operations 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Philly Schuylkill 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wohlsen Construction Self Perform 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR 1TF1 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Operations - TULSA OK 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Residence Inn Orlando East UCF 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Chamberlain 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE DiTomaso, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Energy Industries - Ronkonkoma 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE cfm Distributors 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE FRP Sheet Metal Contracting Corp 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.