Speed reducers (i.e., power transmission equipment) manufacturing · Michigan

Cone Drive Operations LUD

Ludington, MI · ~36 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cone Drive Operations LUD runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Speed reducers (i.e., power transmission equipment) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Cone Drive Operations LUD: 1.3 TCR = 39% of Speed reducers (i.e., power transmission equipment) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cone Drive Operations LUD safety composite

Cone Drive Operations LUD scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cone Drive Operations LUD held a steady TCR band

Cone Drive Operations LUD's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333612 · Ludington, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/7
  • PHOTO Cage Gear & Machine …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cage Gear & Machine LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Cone Drive Operations LUD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cone Drive Operations LUD averages 1.3 TCR (39% of the Speed reducers (i.e., power transmission equipment) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cone Drive Operations LUD TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Cone Drive Operations LUD falls in its industry

106 Speed reducers (i.e., power tr establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 7 Speed reducers (i.e., power tr employers in Michigan.

Cone Drive Operations LUD (36 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cone Drive Operations LUD
Cone Drive Operations LUD (36 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Cone Drive Operations LUD has fewer employees than the Speed reducers (i.e., power transmission median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333612 · MI · Ludington

106 Speed reducers (i.e., power transmission equipment) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 55 employers in Ludington, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cage Gear & Machine LLC 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bison Gear & Engineering Corp. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlanta Gear Works Inc 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SEW Eurodrive Lyman Assembly 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE R & R ASPHALT INC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Water Energy Center 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Facilities 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Haven Office 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Ludington Hospital - SHLH 610 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2102 294 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ludington 280 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2102 274 FTE
NAT-TCR Charles J. Merlo Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Calumet Branded Products - Porter 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Morsey Constructors, LLC 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Filter Technology Inc 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE DJZ5 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Legacy Groceries, LLC d/b/a Save-A-Lot 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Immix Management Services 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Courtyard Marriott Las Vegas Convention Center 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.