Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing · Michigan

Cone Drive Operations TC

Traverse City, MI · ~183 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cone Drive Operations TC runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Cone Drive Operations TC: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cone Drive Operations TC safety composite

Cone Drive Operations TC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2023

Cone Drive Operations TC injury rate improved

Cone Drive Operations TC's TCR fell 0.5 from 1.0 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.0 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333612 · Traverse City, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Belton - 905 Highway…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~183 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Belton - 905 Highway 247 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Cone Drive Operations TC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cone Drive Operations TC averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cone Drive Operations TC TCR series: 2016=1 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Cone Drive Operations TC falls in its industry

106 Drives, high-speed industrial establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Drives, high-speed industrial employers in Michigan.

Cone Drive Operations TC (183 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cone Drive Operations TC
Cone Drive Operations TC (183 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Cone Drive Operations TC has more employees than the Drives, high-speed industrial (except hy median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.5 0.6 4 0 0
2016 1.0 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333612 · MI · Traverse City

106 Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 197 employers in Traverse City, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Belton - 905 Highway 247 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intra Aerospace 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Falk 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quad Plus LLC 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walther Farms LLC 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wyoming Manufacturing Facility - KNA 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lear Corporation - Farwell 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Jordan Plastics Beaverton 183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Munson Medical Center 3,845 FTE
CITY-NEAR Munson Healthcare 830 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northwestern Michigan College 705 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northwestern Michigan College - 28999 569 FTE
NAT-TCR BERRYQDC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR EFW Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Rosen USA 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Legacy Commercial Cleaning, LLC - Cincinnati 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corporate 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Collins & Hermann 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tomball 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reilly Electrical Contractors, Inc. 183 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.