Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Wisconsin

Conger Industries, Inc.

Green Bay, WI · ~126 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Conger Industries, Inc. runs at 195% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

Conger Industries, Inc.: 4.1 TCR = 195% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Conger Industries, Inc. safety composite

Conger Industries, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2021→2024

Conger Industries, Inc. injury rate improved

Conger Industries, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.6 from 5.5 in 2021 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=5.5 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Green Bay, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 195% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #54/87
  • PHOTO Cornerstone Mechanic…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~126 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cornerstone Mechanical Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Conger Industries, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Conger Industries, Inc. averages 4.1 TCR (195% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Conger Industries, Inc. TCR series: 2021=5.5 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=4 · BLS 2.1

Where Conger Industries, Inc. falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 87 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Wisconsin.

Conger Industries, Inc. (126 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Conger Industries, Inc.
Conger Industries, Inc. (126 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Conger Industries, Inc. has more employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 4.0 5 0 0
2023 2.6 2.6 3 0 0
2022 4.3 2.6 5 0 0
2021 5.5 0.9 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · WI · Green Bay

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 563 employers in Green Bay, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone Mechanical Services, Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meade Tractor 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Antonio Location 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toccoa, GA 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waunakee Remodeling 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE EDGERTON CONTRACTORS, INC 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ocean Spray Tomah Processing Plant 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dean WI - De Pere 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI005 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,296 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital Campus 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 300000170855522 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 2,379 FTE
NAT-TCR WFI International 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Tufts Medical Center 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Carrier Commercial Services (Los Angeles) 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Williamsport Pa 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Terrace Nursing and Rehabilitation Facility 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boise Main Office 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dedicated Rialto Target 126 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.