Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network · Arizona

Connect Training and Logistics, LLC

Yuma, AZ · ~82 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
25.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Connect Training and Logistics, LLC runs at 396% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network workplace, earning a grade F.

Connect Training and Logistics, LLC: 25.7 TCR = 396% of Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Connect Training and Logistics, LLC safety composite

Connect Training and Logistics, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 25.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.2

2022→2023

Connect Training and Logistics, LLC injury rate improved

Connect Training and Logistics, LLC's TCR fell 11.2 from 31.3 in 2022 to 20.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 31.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=31.3 · 2023=20.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Yuma, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 25.7 · 396% of ind

  • DART 20.1 DART
  • RANK #127/130
  • PHOTO Rider Logistics LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rider Logistics LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Connect Training and Logistics, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Connect Training and Logistics, LLC averages 25.7 TCR (396% of the Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Connect Training and Logistics, LLC TCR series: 2022=31.3 · 2023=20.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Connect Training and Logistics, LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Local letter and parcel delive establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #127 safest of 130 Local letter and parcel delive employers in Arizona.

Connect Training and Logistics, LLC (82 employees, TCR 25.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Connect Training and Logistics, LLC
Connect Training and Logistics, LLC (82 employees, TCR 25.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Connect Training and Logistics, LLC has fewer employees than the Local letter and parcel delivery service median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 20.1 20.1 5 0 0
2022 31.3 12.8 22 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · AZ · Yuma

6,679 Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 274 employers in Yuma, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rider Logistics LLC 25.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR OTAD: On Time Accurate Delivery, Inc 25.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thoroughfare Logistics LLC 25.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 146 25.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Santa Cruz Farm 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Utility 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE CAZ-Pinnacle Peak Operations 0042-FAC52 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE PINNACLE PEAK OPS CNTR 0042-FAC52 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primetime Harvesting Inc 2,271 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothill Packing- Arizona 2,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yuma Regional Medical Center 1,757 FTE
CITY-NEAR PGM PACKING INC 1,423 FTE
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 153 25.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - Cromwell 25.7 TCR
NAT-TCR SKLD Livonia 25.7 TCR
NAT-TCR SupplyHouse New Jersey LLC 25.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Theisen's of Coralville 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Rapids - MI 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE RRSC Minneapolis/St. Paul Market 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE EBS General Engineering Inc 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.