Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Connecticut

Connecticut Container Corp

North Haven, CT · ~133 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Connecticut Container Corp runs at 226% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade F.

Connecticut Container Corp: 7.5 TCR = 226% of Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Connecticut Container Corp safety composite

Connecticut Container Corp scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2016→2024

Connecticut Container Corp injury rate improved

Connecticut Container Corp's TCR fell 4.0 from 11.1 in 2016 to 7.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.1 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=7.3 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=7.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · North Haven, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.5 · 226% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #10/12
  • PHOTO Opus Packaging - New…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~133 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Opus Packaging - New Bremen (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Connecticut Container Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Connecticut Container Corp averages 7.5 TCR (226% of the Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Connecticut Container Corp TCR series: 2016=11.1 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=7.3 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=7 · BLS 3.3

Where Connecticut Container Corp falls in its industry

1,338 Shipping containers, corrugate establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 12 Shipping containers, corrugate employers in Connecticut.

Connecticut Container Corp (133 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Connecticut Container Corp
Connecticut Container Corp (133 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Connecticut Container Corp has more employees than the Shipping containers, corrugated, made fr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.0 3.5 9 5 0
2023 6.3 3.7 12 0 0
2018 7.3 4.0 9 0 0
2017 5.6 2.4 7 0 0
2016 11.1 6.0 12 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · CT · North Haven

1,338 Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 95 employers in North Haven, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Opus Packaging - New Bremen 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheets Unlimited 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Texas Container 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant Facility - Braniff - 01 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE KBE Building Corporation 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Empire Paving 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE 300 East River Drive 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE OKAY Headquarters 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BDL3 4,773 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BDL3 4,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR CT-01 4,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medtonic 2,818 FTE
NAT-TCR Hibbing Public Utilities 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Kahler Grand Hotel 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Knouse Foods orrtanna 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Denison 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookfield Healthcare Center 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transitions Healthcare North Huntingdon 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Standard Beverage Corporation - Wichita 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Petroleum 133 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.