Metal Crown, Closure, and Other Metal Stamping (except Automotive) · Connecticut

Connecticut Spring & Stamping

Farmington, CT · ~458 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Connecticut Spring & Stamping runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Metal Crown, Closure, and Other Metal Stamping (except Automotive) workplace, earning a grade C.

Connecticut Spring & Stamping: 3.6 TCR = 109% of Metal Crown, Closure, and Other Metal Stamping (except Automotive) BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Connecticut Spring & Stamping safety composite

Connecticut Spring & Stamping scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Connecticut Spring & Stamping: 3.4 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 5.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.04× in 2024

Connecticut Spring & Stamping's TCR rose 0.8 from 3.4 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Farmington, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 109% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #6/23
  • PHOTO MJ Celco, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 144 inj
  • SIZE ~458 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MJ Celco, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Connecticut Spring & Stamping in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Connecticut Spring & Stamping averages 3.6 TCR (109% of the Metal Crown, Closure, and Other Metal Stamping (except Automotive) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Connecticut Spring & Stamping TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=4.5 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Connecticut Spring & Stamping falls in its industry

477 Metal Crown, Closure, and Othe establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 23 Metal Crown, Closure, and Othe employers in Connecticut.

Connecticut Spring & Stamping (458 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Connecticut Spring & Stamping
Connecticut Spring & Stamping (458 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Connecticut Spring & Stamping has more employees than the Metal Crown, Closure, and Other Metal St median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 3.7 17 1 0
2023 5.1 3.9 18 3 0
2021 4.5 4.0 22 0 0
2020 4.2 2.9 17 0 0
2019 3.7 1.4 13 3 0
2018 3.6 1.7 17 0 0
2017 0.1 0.0 24 0 0
2016 3.4 1.7 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · CT · Farmington

477 Metal Crown, Closure, and Other Metal Stamping (except Automotive) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 93 employers in Farmington, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MJ Celco, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Small Parts Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Band & Tag Company 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kapco Inc. - Osceola 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Franklin Medical Group, PC 459 FTE
STATE-SIZE Town of Westport 459 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockville General Hospital 456 FTE
STATE-SIZE Davis-Standard 461 FTE
CITY-NEAR UConn Health Center 5,466 FTE
CITY-NEAR UTC Corporate Office Farmington Campus 1,192 FTE
CITY-NEAR UTC Corporate Offices 1,138 FTE
CITY-NEAR TRUMPF Inc. 826 FTE
NAT-TCR Margaret Mary Health 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR SBCIVA, Inc 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR All American Asphalt 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant 239 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sensitech Inc 458 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nvnov - Lone Mountain 458 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gahal - Gainesville 458 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5250 Locust Grove Rdc 458 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.