Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · California

Connections For Life

Vacaville, CA · ~104 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Connections For Life runs at 256% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Connections For Life: 9.7 TCR = 256% of Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Connections For Life safety composite

Connections For Life scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2019→2020

Connections For Life injury rate improved

Connections For Life's TCR fell 3.8 from 11.6 in 2019 to 7.8 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=11.6 · 2020=7.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Vacaville, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.7 · 256% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #196/230
  • PHOTO Hope Community Resou…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hope Community Resources Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Connections For Life in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Connections For Life averages 9.7 TCR (256% of the Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Connections For Life TCR series: 2019=11.6 · 2020=7.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Connections For Life falls in its industry

1,320 Companion services for disable establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #196 safest of 230 Companion services for disable employers in California.

Connections For Life (104 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Connections For Life
Connections For Life (104 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Connections For Life has more employees than the Companion services for disabled persons, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 7.8 6.3 5 0 0
2019 11.6 5.8 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · CA · Vacaville

1,320 Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 130 employers in Vacaville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hope Community Resources Inc. 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keeling Road 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Social Vocational Services - 437 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1358 East 12th Street 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE farm management inc 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kendall Farms LP 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maple Dairy L.P 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Veg-Land, Inc. 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 1,830 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : SMF5 1,686 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121451 1,665 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR California State Prison Solano 1,339 FTE
NAT-TCR Valley View Nursing & Rehab 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Crofton Convalescent Centr Inc 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lost Creek Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 016 Dayton 9.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE McInnis Electric Co. 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE BOE - Central Office 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hillside Medical Center 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colorado Operations 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.