Polyurethane foam products manufacturing · North Carolina

Conover Pouring Plant

Conover, NC · ~159 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Conover Pouring Plant runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Polyurethane foam products manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Conover Pouring Plant: 2.9 TCR = 86% of Polyurethane foam products manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Conover Pouring Plant safety composite

Conover Pouring Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.5

2016→2024

Conover Pouring Plant injury rate improved

Conover Pouring Plant's TCR fell 7.5 from 8.2 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.2 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Conover, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 86% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/39
  • PHOTO Secon Rubber and Pla…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~159 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Secon Rubber and Plastics INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Conover Pouring Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Conover Pouring Plant averages 2.9 TCR (86% of the Polyurethane foam products manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Conover Pouring Plant TCR series: 2016=8.2 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=3 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Conover Pouring Plant falls in its industry

474 Polyurethane foam products man establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 39 Polyurethane foam products man employers in North Carolina.

Conover Pouring Plant (159 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Conover Pouring Plant
Conover Pouring Plant (159 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Conover Pouring Plant has more employees than the Polyurethane foam products manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.4 1.4 2 0 0
2022 2.3 2.3 3 0 0
2021 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2020 3.0 2.2 4 0 0
2019 2.1 2.1 3 0 0
2018 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2017 5.3 4.2 10 0 1
2016 8.2 6.5 19 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · NC · Conover

474 Polyurethane foam products manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 95 employers in Conover, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Secon Rubber and Plastics INC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Florence (BP) 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fernley (Polyiso) 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reiss Industries, LLC 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE NHM Constructors, Inc. 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pitt Electric ORI, LLC 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lovelady Plant 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE IPEX USA LLC 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zenith - Conover 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4224 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4224 327 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2510 Conover Folding 309 FTE
NAT-TCR FoodTown #202 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Allred & Associates, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR FTD 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Holcomb Station 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Breakthru Beverage 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fisher Dynamics - Central 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE LP Winchester, LLC--Fountain Circle 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Whse 0 Seffner - #01 159 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.