Property managing, residential real estate · Arizona

Consolidated Asset Management, Inc.

Phoenix, AZ · ~307 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Consolidated Asset Management, Inc. runs at 249% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Property managing, residential real estate workplace, earning a grade F.

Consolidated Asset Management, Inc.: 3.5 TCR = 249% of Property managing, residential real estate BLS 1.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Consolidated Asset Management, Inc. safety composite

Consolidated Asset Management, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2021→2023

Consolidated Asset Management, Inc. injury rate improved

Consolidated Asset Management, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.2 from 4.6 in 2021 to 3.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.6 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531311 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.5 · 249% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO Universal Developmen…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~307 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Universal Development & Construction LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Consolidated Asset Management, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Consolidated Asset Management, Inc. averages 3.5 TCR (249% of the Property managing, residential real estate BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Consolidated Asset Management, Inc. TCR series: 2021=4.6 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=3.4 · BLS 1.4

Where Consolidated Asset Management, Inc. falls in its industry

500 Property managing, residential establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Property managing, residential employers in Arizona.

Consolidated Asset Management, Inc. (307 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Consolidated Asset Management, Inc.
Consolidated Asset Management, Inc. (307 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Consolidated Asset Management, Inc. has more employees than the Property managing, residential real esta median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.4 0.0 6 0 0
2022 2.4 2.4 6 0 0
2021 4.6 4.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531311 · AZ · Phoenix

500 Property managing, residential real estate employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Universal Development & Construction LLC 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Independence Village of Avon Lake 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Emeraldbay at Key Colony Condominium Association 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grandhaven Assisted Living & Memory Care 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spencer Construction 307 FTE
STATE-SIZE ICCAZ - 001 307 FTE
STATE-SIZE QUEEAZ-INC-QUEEN CREEK,AZ - ARIZONA 307 FTE
STATE-SIZE Purina 308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Unit #2961 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2011 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 0651 - Orlando Fl Bus Ctr 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Minnesota Oncology - Minneapolis 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Porto's Bakery West Covina, Inc 307 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pure Fishing - Spirit Lake 307 FTE
NAT-SIZE Headquarters 307 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plaza Construction New York 307 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.