Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Minnesota

Consolidated Container Company LLC

Minneapolis, MN · ~74 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Consolidated Container Company LLC runs at 196% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

Consolidated Container Company LLC: 4.1 TCR = 196% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Consolidated Container Company LLC safety composite

Consolidated Container Company LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.2

2023→2024

Consolidated Container Company LLC injury rate improved

Consolidated Container Company LLC's TCR fell 8.2 from 8.2 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=8.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 196% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #39/56
  • PHOTO Crown Lift Trucks Ne…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crown Lift Trucks New Orleans (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Consolidated Container Company LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Consolidated Container Company LLC averages 4.1 TCR (196% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Consolidated Container Company LLC TCR series: 2023=8.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Consolidated Container Company LLC falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 56 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Minnesota.

Consolidated Container Company LLC (74 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Consolidated Container Company LLC
Consolidated Container Company LLC (74 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Consolidated Container Company LLC has more employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 8.2 5.9 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MN · Minneapolis

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crown Lift Trucks New Orleans 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Felton02 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alta Enterprises LLC- Wilmington 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TAW Power Systems, Inc. -- Pompano 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Willet Hauser Company, LLC 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE BT Shoreview 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wenzel Plymouth Plumbing 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metro Home Insulation 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR 300000437836005 - TX-Fort Worth-Intermodal Office 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Alden Shoe Co. 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Thybar Corporation 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Alfa Laval Inc. Broken Arrow (loc code: ALACEC) 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kidd's Services 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Integra Technologies Inc. 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE 307 Providence 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE ufp Folkston LLC 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.