Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade · Texas

Consolidated Metal Technologies, Inc.

Round Rock, TX · ~50 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Consolidated Metal Technologies, Inc. runs at 338% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Consolidated Metal Technologies, Inc.: 11.2 TCR = 338% of Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Consolidated Metal Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Consolidated Metal Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.9

2017→2018

Consolidated Metal Technologies, Inc. injury rate improved

Consolidated Metal Technologies, Inc.'s TCR fell 11.9 from 17.1 in 2017 to 5.2 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 17.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.1 · 2018=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Round Rock, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.2 · 338% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #42/43
  • PHOTO UniMetal Thomaston
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UniMetal Thomaston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Consolidated Metal Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Consolidated Metal Technologies, Inc. averages 11.2 TCR (338% of the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Consolidated Metal Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2017=17.1 · 2018=5.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Consolidated Metal Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

585 Electroplating metals and form establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 43 Electroplating metals and form employers in Texas.

Consolidated Metal Technologies, Inc. (50 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Consolidated Metal Technologies, Inc.
Consolidated Metal Technologies, Inc. (50 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Consolidated Metal Technologies, Inc. has fewer employees than the Electroplating metals and formed product median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.2 3.5 2 1 0
2017 17.1 10.7 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · TX · Round Rock

585 Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 203 employers in Round Rock, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UniMetal Thomaston 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Side Plating Plant 4 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Douglas Corporation 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Paul Location 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1836 Farms LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwertner Farms, Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Floydada Coop Gin #1 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gulf Coast Area Office 6400 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR US TX Round Rock Office 01 5,052 FTE
CITY-NEAR Round Rock 2 1,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR US TX Round Rock Office 07 1,735 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Round Rock 1,576 FTE
NAT-TCR Palm Harbor (Flcle) 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Gaylord (Migay) 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 0107 - Jacksonville- Beach Blv 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR N and R of Charleston LLC 11.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE UG2 - 470 - One Financial Center 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE C/P Northern Glacier 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Action Resources - Phoenix 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holland - HU 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.