Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Ohio
Constant Aviation
Cleveland, OH · ~760 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 1.7
- Avg TCR
- 4.5
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Constant Aviation runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade A.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 1.7
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 4.5
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 26
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Constant Aviation's OSHA Total Case Rate of 1.7 to the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark of 4.5 (37% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Constant Aviation's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 4.5 industry benchmark.
Where Constant Aviation falls in its industry
1,118 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishmentsSafer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.
Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 26 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Ohio.
Trend analysis for Constant Aviation
Between 2017 and 2018, Constant Aviation's Total Case Rate improved from 1.7 to 1.6 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 8% decrease across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2018, at a TCR of 1.6, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 1.7, a spread of 0.1 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, Constant Aviation recorded 26 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 26 injuries shown on this page for Constant Aviation are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 488190 - Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding).
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2018)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
7 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 1,761,760 hours worked = 0.79 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Constant Aviation (this establishment) | 1.66 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) industry avg | 4.50 | BLS IIF, NAICS 488190 |
| Ohio state avg (all industries) | 3.90 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Constant Aviation to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2018: 14 reportable incidents · 14 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 12 reportable incidents · 12 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Constant Aviation's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 37% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) benchmark, Constant Aviation reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Constant Aviation's safety grade?
How many injuries has Constant Aviation reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Ohio, and by nearby establishments in Cleveland - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~1.7)
Similar size (~760 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.