Excavating, earthmoving or land clearing, mining (except overburden removal at open pit mine sites or quarries) · Minnesota

Construction

Courtland, MN · ~25 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Construction runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Excavating, earthmoving or land clearing, mining (except overburden removal at open pit mine sites or quarries) workplace, earning a grade A.

Construction: 0.9 TCR = 33% of Excavating, earthmoving or land clearing, mining (except overburden removal at open pit mine sites or quarries) BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Construction safety composite

Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Construction held a steady TCR band

Construction's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Courtland, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/42
  • PHOTO Retro Environmental …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Retro Environmental Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Construction averages 0.9 TCR (33% of the Excavating, earthmoving or land clearing, mining (except overburden removal at open pit mine sites or quarries) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Construction TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Construction falls in its industry

1,750 Excavating, earthmoving or lan establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 42 Excavating, earthmoving or lan employers in Minnesota.

Construction (25 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Construction
Construction (25 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Construction has fewer employees than the Excavating, earthmoving or land clearing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.7 3.7 0 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · MN · Courtland

1,750 Excavating, earthmoving or land clearing, mining (except overburden removal at open pit mine sites or quarries) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 5 employers in Courtland, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Retro Environmental Inc 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Holbrook Company Inc 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Landmark Construction 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR BRAZOS VALLEY CONTRACTING CO. 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE GDM Seeds, Inc - Hutchinson, MN 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Park Rapids Trucking 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Country Pork LLP 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Select Genetics MN IPH 03-0110-10, 50, 51, 52, 970 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carrs Tree Service - Courtland 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hancock Concrete Products, LLC- Courtland 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR 989 Main Street 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR IPG - Courtland 22 FTE
NAT-TCR Landmark Construction 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Home Headquarters Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hotel Los Gatos 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CPG Louisville South Park 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dairyland Energy Solutions, Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regal Plumbing & Heating Marion 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rossi North America - Suwanee 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willard Save A Lot #24857 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.