Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Maryland

Construction

Edgewood, MD · ~35 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Construction runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade C.

Construction: 3.4 TCR = 118% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Construction safety composite

Construction scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Construction held a steady TCR band

Construction's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=9.4 · 2021=9.3 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Edgewood, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 118% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #77/99
  • PHOTO M.G. Oil Company #556
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: M.G. Oil Company #556 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Construction averages 3.4 TCR (118% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Construction TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=9.4 · 2021=9.3 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Construction falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #77 safest of 99 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Maryland.

Construction (35 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Construction
Construction (35 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Construction has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.3 5.3 1 0 0
2021 9.3 4.7 2 0 0
2020 9.4 9.4 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MD · Edgewood

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 29 employers in Edgewood, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR M.G. Oil Company #556 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burk Erectors 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burgos Group 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE MaryMed, LLC - Massey 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Region 111 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHRG MD Ops 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mid Atlantic Bath Solutions, LLC 71 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR 816 - EFC3 Edgewood, MD 1,477 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smiths Detection, Inc. 807 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smiths Detection Edgewood 363 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smiths Detection, Inc. Field Service 277 FTE
NAT-TCR Summit Anaheim 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cak - Dhl 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. (PC6055) 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Noble Oil Services, Inc. (Corporate) 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coral Construction company 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Automotive Service Products 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Automatic Fire Sprinkler, LLC 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trench Shore Rentals -Phoenix 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.