Commercial building construction general contractors · Missouri

Construction Services Group

Neosho, MO · ~35 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Construction Services Group runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Construction Services Group: 0.8 TCR = 27% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Construction Services Group safety composite

Construction Services Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Construction Services Group: 0.0 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.9 TCR · DART/TCR 3.3× in 2024

Construction Services Group's TCR rose 2.6 from 0.0 in 2018 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 3.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Neosho, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 27% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #25/122
  • PHOTO Urban Atelier Group …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Urban Atelier Group Main Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Construction Services Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Construction Services Group averages 0.8 TCR (27% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Construction Services Group TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 2.9

Where Construction Services Group falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 122 Commercial building constructi employers in Missouri.

Construction Services Group (35 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Construction Services Group
Construction Services Group (35 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Construction Services Group has fewer employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2023 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MO · Neosho

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 53 employers in Neosho, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Urban Atelier Group Main Office 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Novak Construction Company 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parrish-McCall Constructors, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fisher Construction Group, Inc. 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Leadership Team 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Substations South 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Dorsett District 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Meter Services - UEC 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR La-Z-Boy Midwest 798 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 17 388 FTE
CITY-NEAR 17 356 FTE
CITY-NEAR Neosho Distribution Center & Warehouse 337 FTE
NAT-TCR County of York Emergency Communications 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Four Seasons Hotel, Houston 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hurst 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CA-El Segundo 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE CS Wholesale Grocers : Dubois, PA (GDC) 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hamilton Iron Works, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bull Moose Tube Company Chicago Division 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cranbury, NJ - Cranbury Statio 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.