Tanks, storage, plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Containment Solutions Incorporated (MTU)

Mount Union, PA · ~161 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Containment Solutions Incorporated (MTU) runs at 187% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Tanks, storage, plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Containment Solutions Incorporated (MTU): 6.2 TCR = 187% of Tanks, storage, plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Containment Solutions Incorporated (MTU) safety composite

Containment Solutions Incorporated (MTU) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Containment Solutions Incorporated (MTU): 3.4 → 8.9 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 8.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.72× in 2017

Containment Solutions Incorporated (MTU)'s TCR rose 5.5 from 3.4 in 2016 to 8.9 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Mount Union, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 187% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #139/183
  • PHOTO Poly Processing Comp…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~161 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Poly Processing Company, LLC Winchester (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Containment Solutions Incorporated (MTU) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Containment Solutions Incorporated (MTU) averages 6.2 TCR (187% of the Tanks, storage, plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Containment Solutions Incorporated (MTU) TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=8.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Containment Solutions Incorporated (MTU) falls in its industry

2,838 Tanks, storage, plastics or fi establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #139 safest of 183 Tanks, storage, plastics or fi employers in Pennsylvania.

Containment Solutions Incorporated (MTU) (161 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Containment Solutions Incorporated (MTU)
Containment Solutions Incorporated (MTU) (161 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Containment Solutions Incorporated (MTU) has more employees than the Tanks, storage, plastics or fiberglass, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 8.9 4.5 12 0 0
2016 3.4 2.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · PA · Mount Union

2,838 Tanks, storage, plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 9 employers in Mount Union, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Poly Processing Company, LLC Winchester 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vision Plastics, inc. 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brentwood Industries 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Premold Corp 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beaver Valley Nuclear Plant 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE HP HOOD LLC 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE SunOpta Allentown 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE A.S.K. Foods, Inc. West Plant 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR IFC Services, Inc. 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bonney Forge 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR NOV Fiberglass Systems 155 FTE
CITY-NEAR 48 66 FTE
NAT-TCR Alexandria (Laale) 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cstk Kc 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Vibra Hospital of Fort Wayne, LLC d/b/a Vibra Hospital of Fort Wayne 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Usmc- E Mess 27269 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pototoc Spring 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6400-Swy 0024 0053 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bremerton (Wabre) 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norfolk (Vanor) 161 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.