Tanks, storage, plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing · Oklahoma

Containment Solutions Incorporated (TUL)

Tulsa, OK · ~43 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Containment Solutions Incorporated (TUL) runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Tanks, storage, plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Containment Solutions Incorporated (TUL): 2.7 TCR = 82% of Tanks, storage, plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Containment Solutions Incorporated (TUL) safety composite

Containment Solutions Incorporated (TUL) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Containment Solutions Incorporated (TUL): 0.0 → 5.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 5.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2017

Containment Solutions Incorporated (TUL)'s TCR rose 5.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 5.4 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Tulsa, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #9/26
  • PHOTO Roseville Plant
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Roseville Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Containment Solutions Incorporated (TUL) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Containment Solutions Incorporated (TUL) averages 2.7 TCR (82% of the Tanks, storage, plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Containment Solutions Incorporated (TUL) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=5.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Containment Solutions Incorporated (TUL) falls in its industry

2,838 Tanks, storage, plastics or fi establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 26 Tanks, storage, plastics or fi employers in Oklahoma.

Containment Solutions Incorporated (TUL) (43 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Containment Solutions Incorporated (TUL)
Containment Solutions Incorporated (TUL) (43 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Containment Solutions Incorporated (TUL) has fewer employees than the Tanks, storage, plastics or fiberglass, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 5.4 1.8 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · OK · Tulsa

2,838 Tanks, storage, plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Roseville Plant 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MIDWEST MOLDING INC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Currier Plastics 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anfinsen Plastic Molding, Inc. 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Weatherford 4700 Commerce St, Weatherford, OK 73096 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redbud Plant 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tulsa/Weleetka 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Service Center 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR Southbridge St #00 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PT224 - Las Vegas NV Core 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Houston - Ford 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Action Resources - Theodore 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn Coconut Grove 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springhill Suites 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yokohama Tire Corporation - Columbus DC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE HBSHSENY79 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.