Overhead door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation · Washington

Continental Door Company

Spokane, WA · ~34 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Continental Door Company runs at 711% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Overhead door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation workplace, earning a grade F.

Continental Door Company: 19.9 TCR = 711% of Overhead door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Continental Door Company safety composite

Continental Door Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 22.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Continental Door Company: 14.5 → 34.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 34.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.11× in 2024

Continental Door Company's TCR rose 19.7 from 14.5 in 2018 to 34.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Spokane, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.9 · 711% of ind

  • DART 22.1 DART
  • RANK #22/22
  • PHOTO BDK Door
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 52 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BDK Door (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Continental Door Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Continental Door Company averages 19.9 TCR (711% of the Overhead door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Continental Door Company TCR series: 2018=14.5 · 2019=17.7 · 2020=13.4 · 2021=15.3 · 2022=27.4 · 2023=16.7 · 2024=34.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Continental Door Company falls in its industry

1,138 Overhead door, commercial- or establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 22 Overhead door, commercial- or employers in Washington.

Continental Door Company (34 employees, TCR 19.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Continental Door Company
Continental Door Company (34 employees, TCR 19.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Continental Door Company has fewer employees than the Overhead door, commercial- or industrial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 34.2 22.1 17 0 0
2023 16.7 11.9 7 0 0
2022 27.4 17.4 10 1 0
2021 15.3 12.3 5 0 0
2020 13.4 10.1 4 0 0
2019 17.7 10.6 5 0 0
2018 14.5 7.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · WA · Spokane

1,138 Overhead door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 551 employers in Spokane, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BDK Door 19.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aztec 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR VFC NC 17.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Marion 15.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE M & G Farms Inc 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dobbe Farms, LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benjert Farms Inc 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kettle Falls Logging - WP 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000345 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA642 SACRED HEART MEDICAL CENTER-SPOKANE HR 5,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - GEG1 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Spokane 2,451 FTE
NAT-TCR Ponce Can Comp. 19.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 018 - Sanders School 19.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Regency SNF LLC 19.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Halbert Pipe & Steel Co Inc 19.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE At Home Stores #205 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE At Home Stores #214 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ellington Assisted Living Services, LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Middlefield Plastics, Inc. 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.