Homes for the elderly with nursing care · Ohio

Continuing Healthcare at the Ridge

Mineral Ridge, OH · ~133 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Continuing Healthcare at the Ridge runs at 209% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Continuing Healthcare at the Ridge: 13.6 TCR = 209% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Continuing Healthcare at the Ridge safety composite

Continuing Healthcare at the Ridge scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Continuing Healthcare at the Ridge: 9.2 → 14.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 28.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.04× in 2024

Continuing Healthcare at the Ridge's TCR rose 5.7 from 9.2 in 2018 to 14.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 28.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Mineral Ridge, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.6 · 209% of ind

  • DART 14.1 DART
  • RANK #900/1074
  • PHOTO Sanfield Rehabilitat…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~133 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sanfield Rehabilitation & Living Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Continuing Healthcare at the Ridge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Continuing Healthcare at the Ridge averages 13.6 TCR (209% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Continuing Healthcare at the Ridge TCR series: 2018=9.2 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=28.9 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=13.6 · 2023=19.7 · 2024=14.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Continuing Healthcare at the Ridge falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #900 safest of 1074 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in Ohio.

Continuing Healthcare at the Ridge (133 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Continuing Healthcare at the Ridge
Continuing Healthcare at the Ridge (133 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Continuing Healthcare at the Ridge has more employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.9 14.1 4 14 0
2023 19.7 16.9 7 21 0
2022 13.6 11.5 2 11 0
2021 0.1 0.1 7 8 0
2020 28.9 23.3 4 32 0
2019 8.6 7.0 11 0 0
2018 9.2 6.7 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Mineral Ridge

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 4 employers in Mineral Ridge, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sanfield Rehabilitation & Living Center 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accura Healthcare of Sioux City 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kewanee Care Home 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Briarwood Village 13.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Petta Enterprises Cambridge 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Canton 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Foam Technologies Beach City 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Abbott Electric 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jackson International, Inc dba Jaxon 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Causeway at Mineral Ridge 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR specialty pipe & tube 22 FTE
NAT-TCR Kre-Bsl Husky Robbins Brook Operation LLC 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 1801 - Algonquin 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bridgeport 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sanfield Rehabilitation & Living Center 13.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hibbard Skilled Nursing Center 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Team Logistics Corporate 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wheelabrator Group, Inc. 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thompson Pipe Group Precast Dallas JCP 133 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.