Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Ohio

Continuing Healthcare at Willow Haven

Zanesville, OH · ~85 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Continuing Healthcare at Willow Haven runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade D.

Continuing Healthcare at Willow Haven: 8.7 TCR = 134% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Continuing Healthcare at Willow Haven safety composite

Continuing Healthcare at Willow Haven scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Continuing Healthcare at Willow Haven: 3.1 → 14.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 14.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.28× in 2020

Continuing Healthcare at Willow Haven's TCR rose 11.2 from 3.1 in 2019 to 14.3 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Zanesville, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.7 · 134% of ind

  • DART 11.1 DART
  • RANK #706/1074
  • PHOTO Life Care Center of …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Life Care Center of Littleton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Continuing Healthcare at Willow Haven in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Continuing Healthcare at Willow Haven averages 8.7 TCR (134% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Continuing Healthcare at Willow Haven TCR series: 2019=3.1 · 2020=14.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Continuing Healthcare at Willow Haven falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #706 safest of 1074 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Ohio.

Continuing Healthcare at Willow Haven (85 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Continuing Healthcare at Willow Haven
Continuing Healthcare at Willow Haven (85 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Continuing Healthcare at Willow Haven has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 14.3 11.1 5 4 0
2019 3.1 1.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Zanesville

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 139 employers in Zanesville, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Life Care Center of Littleton 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR River Valley Rehabilitation Center 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chulio Hills Health & Rehab, LLC 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aperion Care Arbors at Michigan City 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dollar General (WC USX ZAN) 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5079 - OH Franklin County Corrections 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE First Team Logistics, LLC 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rae Ann Geneva Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Genesis HealthCare Systems 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Genesis HealthCare System 3,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zanesville DC 833 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0047-HES Zanesville 676 FTE
NAT-TCR TLBD Inc 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Bay At Burlington 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PWI 4 - Tulsa 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard by Marriott Santa Monica 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2077-Us Dd Nw Brklyn Queens Branch 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amycel Inc. 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Custom Culinary, Inc 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mechanical 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.