Homes for the elderly with nursing care · Ohio

Continuing Healthcare of Boardman

Youngstown, OH · ~53 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Continuing Healthcare of Boardman runs at 331% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Continuing Healthcare of Boardman: 21.5 TCR = 331% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Continuing Healthcare of Boardman safety composite

Continuing Healthcare of Boardman scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Continuing Healthcare of Boardman: 13.0 → 17.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 49.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.63× in 2024

Continuing Healthcare of Boardman's TCR rose 4.5 from 13.0 in 2018 to 17.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 49.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Youngstown, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.5 · 331% of ind

  • DART 13.7 DART
  • RANK #1032/1074
  • PHOTO Greenridge Post Acut…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Greenridge Post Acute Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Continuing Healthcare of Boardman in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Continuing Healthcare of Boardman averages 21.5 TCR (331% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Continuing Healthcare of Boardman TCR series: 2018=13 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=19.7 · 2021=23.5 · 2022=49.6 · 2023=22.8 · 2024=17.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Continuing Healthcare of Boardman falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1032 safest of 1074 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in Ohio.

Continuing Healthcare of Boardman (53 employees, TCR 21.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Continuing Healthcare of Boardman
Continuing Healthcare of Boardman (53 employees, TCR 21.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Continuing Healthcare of Boardman has fewer employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 17.6 13.7 4 5 0
2023 22.8 21.2 2 12 0
2022 49.6 46.7 3 14 0
2021 23.5 20.9 2 7 0
2020 19.7 15.3 2 7 0
2019 4.6 2.3 2 0 0
2018 13.0 2.2 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Youngstown

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 276 employers in Youngstown, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Greenridge Post Acute Care 21.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverview Pointe Care Center 21.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allure of Prophetstown 21.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hearthstone 21.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buckeye Lake, OH 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Layer Site 5 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE UTI Groveport 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canton Transmission SC 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Elizabeth Health Center 2,702 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health St Elizabeth Health Hospital 2,679 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ohio Edison Company 832 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vallourec Star, LP 681 FTE
NAT-TCR Greene Manufacturing, Inc. 21.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MTW Industries, Inc. 21.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Seafood City Supermarket - Henderson 21.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Highland Township Fire Department 21.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mission Sheet Metal Inc. 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kyana Packaging Solutions 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ahern St. Louis 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Deepwater 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.