Homes for the elderly with nursing care · Ohio

Continuing Healthcare of Cuyahoga Falls

Cuyahoga Falls, OH · ~84 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Continuing Healthcare of Cuyahoga Falls runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Continuing Healthcare of Cuyahoga Falls: 10.6 TCR = 163% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Continuing Healthcare of Cuyahoga Falls safety composite

Continuing Healthcare of Cuyahoga Falls scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2018→2021

Continuing Healthcare of Cuyahoga Falls injury rate improved

Continuing Healthcare of Cuyahoga Falls's TCR fell 3.0 from 3.2 in 2018 to 0.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 32.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.2 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=32.6 · 2021=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Cuyahoga Falls, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 10.6 · 163% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #797/1074
  • PHOTO Edgewood Rehabilitat…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Edgewood Rehabilitation & Living Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Continuing Healthcare of Cuyahoga Falls in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Continuing Healthcare of Cuyahoga Falls averages 10.6 TCR (163% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Continuing Healthcare of Cuyahoga Falls TCR series: 2018=3.2 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=32.6 · 2021=0.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Continuing Healthcare of Cuyahoga Falls falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #797 safest of 1074 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in Ohio.

Continuing Healthcare of Cuyahoga Falls (84 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Continuing Healthcare of Cuyahoga Falls
Continuing Healthcare of Cuyahoga Falls (84 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Continuing Healthcare of Cuyahoga Falls has fewer employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.2 0.1 7 2 0
2020 32.6 30.1 7 19 0
2019 6.3 5.3 6 0 0
2018 3.2 3.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Cuyahoga Falls

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 105 employers in Cuyahoga Falls, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Rehabilitation & Living Center 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avantara North 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bishop Spencer Place Inc. 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Oaks at Northpointe 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Phillips Companies 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus Mound Street Service Center 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE GEM Industrial Inc. - Husky Energy, Lima 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bruns Building and Development and Ohio and Indiana Roofing 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR GOJO Lippman Campus 1,190 FTE
CITY-NEAR WESTERN RESERVE HOSPITAL, LLC 826 FTE
CITY-NEAR GOJO Industries, Inc. - Lippman Campus 748 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alside Window Company - Central 580 FTE
NAT-TCR Km-Km-Kings Mountain 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR OC Logistics LLC 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Nursing Home 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Magnolia Health and Rehab 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Americold Murfreesboro, TN 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Washington Office 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Webster 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Headquarters-0032 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.