Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Control Concepts dba c3controls

Beaver, PA · ~50 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Control Concepts dba c3controls runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Control Concepts dba c3controls: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Control Concepts dba c3controls safety composite

Control Concepts dba c3controls scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Control Concepts dba c3controls held a steady TCR band

Control Concepts dba c3controls's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Beaver, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/14
  • PHOTO Airborn Inc. Addison
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Airborn Inc. Addison (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Control Concepts dba c3controls in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Control Concepts dba c3controls averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Control Concepts dba c3controls TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Control Concepts dba c3controls falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 14 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in Pennsylvania.

Control Concepts dba c3controls (50 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Control Concepts dba c3controls
Control Concepts dba c3controls (50 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Control Concepts dba c3controls has fewer employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · PA · Beaver

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 19 employers in Beaver, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 177 AUT - WINSTON SALEM 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 128 FACN - MIDDLETOWN 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 140 FACN - MIDDLETOWN 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE To-Jo Food Products Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kulp Family Dairy LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maronda Homes Inc of Pennsylvania 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Home Remodeling Pros of Central PA 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heritage Valley Beaver 1,479 FTE
CITY-NEAR WTC 752 FTE
CITY-NEAR BEAVER PA 372 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brighton Rehab and Wellness 311 FTE
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kinship Pointe Seward 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Terra Mulch Products, LLC dba Profile Products, LLC 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sahvya Foods, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nelcorp Electrical Contracting 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caroline Street 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.