Machinery and equipment, large-scale, installation · Missouri

Control Technology & Solutions

Chesterfield, MO · ~83 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Control Technology & Solutions runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Machinery and equipment, large-scale, installation workplace, earning a grade A.

Control Technology & Solutions: 0.9 TCR = 32% of Machinery and equipment, large-scale, installation BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Control Technology & Solutions safety composite

Control Technology & Solutions scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2021→2024

Control Technology & Solutions injury rate improved

Control Technology & Solutions's TCR fell 1.2 from 1.2 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Chesterfield, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/29
  • PHOTO Mitsubishi Electric …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mitsubishi Electric US Inc.-10 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Control Technology & Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Control Technology & Solutions averages 0.9 TCR (32% of the Machinery and equipment, large-scale, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Control Technology & Solutions TCR series: 2021=1.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Control Technology & Solutions falls in its industry

1,138 Machinery and equipment, large establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 29 Machinery and equipment, large employers in Missouri.

Control Technology & Solutions (83 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Control Technology & Solutions
Control Technology & Solutions (83 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Control Technology & Solutions has more employees than the Machinery and equipment, large-scale, in median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.4 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · MO · Chesterfield

1,138 Machinery and equipment, large-scale, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 126 employers in Chesterfield, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mitsubishi Electric US Inc.-10 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Guy M. Turner, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otis Elevator Company-NAES Boston 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Overhead Door Co of Norwich, Incorporated 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Riverside, MO 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vertiv Services Inc - Central Region 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Control Service Company 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE BEI Springfield 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chesterfield, MO 5,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Hospital 3,689 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM MINISTRY OFFICE 1,279 FTE
CITY-NEAR CenturyLink 705 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate Offices 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR RIL Sewon 4729 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Milton J Wood Fire Protection, INC. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Roxy Cinemas 14 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Holland Brewing Pub on 8th 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Devincenzi Concrete Construction 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Festival Foods Andover 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton/Homewood Chicago - ALM Huron, LLC 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.