Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade · Michigan

Controlled Plating Technologies, Inc.

Grand Rapids, MI · ~45 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Controlled Plating Technologies, Inc. runs at 203% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Controlled Plating Technologies, Inc.: 6.7 TCR = 203% of Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Controlled Plating Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Controlled Plating Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Controlled Plating Technologies, Inc.: 3.9 → 9.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 9.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.47× in 2022

Controlled Plating Technologies, Inc.'s TCR rose 5.7 from 3.9 in 2021 to 9.5 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.7 · 203% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #34/48
  • PHOTO Bar Technologies
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bar Technologies (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Controlled Plating Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Controlled Plating Technologies, Inc. averages 6.7 TCR (203% of the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Controlled Plating Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2021=3.9 · 2022=9.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Controlled Plating Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

585 Electroplating metals and form establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 48 Electroplating metals and form employers in Michigan.

Controlled Plating Technologies, Inc. (45 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Controlled Plating Technologies, Inc.
Controlled Plating Technologies, Inc. (45 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Controlled Plating Technologies, Inc. has fewer employees than the Electroplating metals and formed product median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 9.5 3.2 5 1 0
2021 3.9 1.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · MI · Grand Rapids

585 Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bar Technologies 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elm Plating Company 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hohman Plating and Manufacturing LLC 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Erieview Metal Treating Co 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grand Junction Office 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE DeWeerdt Poultry Farm, LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clare SC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thomas Sebold and Associates, Inc. 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR buybuy Baby Tukwila 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Johnson Health Tech Retail Inc 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kasto, Inc. - Export 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR King County Natural Resources & Parks 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Swire Coca-Cola of Scottsbluff 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE B & B Tupelo 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salem Mennonite Home 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill of Colorado Belleview 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.