Garbage collection services · Puerto Rico

Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos Isabela

Gurabo, PR · ~17 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
27.7
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos Isabela runs at 1065% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Garbage collection services workplace, earning a grade F.

Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos Isabela: 27.7 TCR = 1065% of Garbage collection services BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos Isabela safety composite

Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos Isabela scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 27.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 19.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−22.0

2019→2023

Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos Isabela injury rate improved

Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos Isabela's TCR fell 22.0 from 41.2 in 2019 to 19.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 41.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=41.2 · 2020=28.3 · 2021=25.6 · 2022=24.0 · 2023=19.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Gurabo, PR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 27.7 · 1065% of ind

  • DART 19.2 DART
  • RANK #45/45
  • PHOTO Public Works - Sanit…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~17 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Public Works - Sanitation (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Puerto Rico employers → · Look up another →

Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos Isabela in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos Isabela averages 27.7 TCR (1065% of the Garbage collection services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos Isabela TCR series: 2019=41.2 · 2020=28.3 · 2021=25.6 · 2022=24 · 2023=19.2 · BLS 2.6

Where Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos Isabela falls in its industry

2,322 Garbage collection services establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Puerto Rico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 45 Garbage collection services employers in Puerto Rico.

Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos Isabela (17 employees, TCR 27.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos Isabela
Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos Isabela (17 employees, TCR 27.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos Isabela has fewer employees than the Garbage collection services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 19.2 19.2 4 0 0
2022 24.0 24.0 5 0 0
2021 25.6 25.6 4 0 0
2020 28.3 28.3 3 2 0
2019 41.2 41.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · PR · Gurabo

2,322 Garbage collection services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,632 rated employers in Puerto Rico with headcount on file · 55 employers in Gurabo, PR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Public Works - Sanitation 27.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR GOLDEN GATE DISPOSAL COMPANY 27.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tule Trash Company LLC 28.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conwaste Recogido Canovanas 27.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 21-JARDINES DE MONTELLANO 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE 30-JARDINES DE ORIENTE 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALPROEM Engineering Contractors, Corp. 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALPROEM ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS CORP/CAMPAMENTO SANTIAGO SALINAS 17 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universidad Ana G. Mendez - Gurabo 1,226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Janssen Gurabo 843 FTE
CITY-NEAR Janssen Ortho LLC-Gurabo 840 FTE
CITY-NEAR JANSSEN ORTHO LLC 646 FTE
NAT-TCR 6957-ONT 27.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CSJI-Tiffin 27.7 TCR
NAT-TCR KidsPeace Hospital 27.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Latrobe LLC Dsp 27.7 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.