Employer · Michigan

Cook Nuclear

Bridgman, MI · ~1,022 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cook Nuclear runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade D.

Cook Nuclear: 2.0 TCR = 167% of industry BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cook Nuclear safety composite

Cook Nuclear scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2023

Cook Nuclear injury rate improved

Cook Nuclear's TCR fell 3.4 from 3.5 in 2016 to 0.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.5 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Bridgman, MI ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 2.0 · 167% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P6
  • PHOTO 8FB - Nuclear - Radi…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~1,022 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 8FB - Nuclear - Radiation Protection (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Cook Nuclear in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cook Nuclear averages 2.0 TCR (167% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cook Nuclear TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=1 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Cook Nuclear falls in its industry

80 industry establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Cook Nuclear (1,022 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate Cook Nuclear
Cook Nuclear (1,022 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

Cook Nuclear has more employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.1 0.0 0 1 0
2022 1.2 0.0 1 11 0
2021 1.0 0.2 0 9 0
2020 5.1 3.4 0 47 0
2019 1.0 0.0 0 11 0
2018 1.5 0.0 2 14 0
2017 2.6 0.0 0 30 0
2016 3.5 0.1 5 37 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · MI · Bridgman

80 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 7 employers in Bridgman, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 8FB - Nuclear - Radiation Protection 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monticello Training Ctr-LL 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie Is Nuclear Plant-HD 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Maintenance 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dart Container Corporate Offices 1,021 FTE
STATE-SIZE 659 DETROIT EDUCATION RESEARCH 1,021 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arconic Whitehall Operations- Whitehall Castings Plant 1 and 3 1,027 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saginaw 1,017 FTE
CITY-NEAR AEP DC Cook 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6773_15688 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Woods of Bridgman 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bridgman Care Operating, LLC dba West Woods of Bridgman 82 FTE
NAT-TCR EPIC Piping - San Marcos 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cameron Warehouse 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Machado Construction 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Orangeburg Sc Plant 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6925-HNL 1,022 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corpus Christi Medical Center 1,022 FTE
NAT-SIZE K181-D181 1,022 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlas MedStaff, LLC 1,022 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.