Agricultural cooperative extension program administration · California

Cooperative Agricultural Support Service

Sacramento, CA · ~299 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cooperative Agricultural Support Service runs at 266% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Agricultural cooperative extension program administration workplace, earning a grade F.

Cooperative Agricultural Support Service: 8.5 TCR = 266% of Agricultural cooperative extension program administration BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cooperative Agricultural Support Service safety composite

Cooperative Agricultural Support Service scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cooperative Agricultural Support Service: 5.8 → 11.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 11.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.9× in 2019

Cooperative Agricultural Support Service's TCR rose 5.5 from 5.8 in 2018 to 11.3 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 926140 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.5 · 266% of ind

  • DART 7.6 DART
  • RANK #14/19
  • PHOTO San Joaquin County D…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~299 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: San Joaquin County Department of Agriculture (0.6 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Cooperative Agricultural Support Service in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cooperative Agricultural Support Service averages 8.5 TCR (266% of the Agricultural cooperative extension program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cooperative Agricultural Support Service TCR series: 2018=5.8 · 2019=11.3 · BLS 3.2

Where Cooperative Agricultural Support Service falls in its industry

30 Agricultural cooperative exten establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 19 Agricultural cooperative exten employers in California.

Cooperative Agricultural Support Service (299 employees, TCR 8.5) among 14 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 15 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cooperative Agricultural Support Service
Cooperative Agricultural Support Service (299 employees, TCR 8.5) among 14 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Cooperative Agricultural Support Service has more employees than the Agricultural cooperative extension progr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 11.3 7.6 27 4 0
2018 5.8 5.5 19 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

926140 · CA · Sacramento

30 Agricultural cooperative extension program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR San Joaquin County Department of Agriculture 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Agricultural Commissioner 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greater Los Angeles County Vector Control District 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ag/ Weights & Measures 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Peri & Sons Farms of California, LLC 299 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terra Bella 299 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colorado Farms LLC. 299 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry Leal 299 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0019 4469 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0019 1800 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 4837-9137 St Lukes Rehab 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 50105 - Capstone Home Depot Rdc Mccalla 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plant 5 299 FTE
NAT-SIZE 629 - Atlanta 299 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coppell CSC and DFW Hospitals 299 FTE
NAT-SIZE Duro Bag - Walton 299 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.