Homes for the elderly with nursing care · Massachusetts

Copley at Stoughton

Stoughton, MA · ~184 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Copley at Stoughton runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade B.

Copley at Stoughton: 4.7 TCR = 72% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Copley at Stoughton safety composite

Copley at Stoughton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.7

2016→2024

Copley at Stoughton injury rate improved

Copley at Stoughton's TCR fell 7.7 from 10.4 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.4 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Stoughton, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.7 · 72% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #116/423
  • PHOTO Concord Care Center
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 45 inj
  • SIZE ~184 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Concord Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Copley at Stoughton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Copley at Stoughton averages 4.7 TCR (72% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Copley at Stoughton TCR series: 2016=10.4 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Copley at Stoughton falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #116 safest of 423 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in Massachusetts.

Copley at Stoughton (184 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Copley at Stoughton
Copley at Stoughton (184 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Copley at Stoughton has more employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 1.9 3 0 0
2023 3.8 1.9 4 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.1 3.3 5 0 0
2019 6.8 6.0 8 1 0
2018 9.8 6.8 10 3 0
2016 10.4 9.7 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MA · Stoughton

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 65 employers in Stoughton, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Concord Care Center 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Irving Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stonespring of Vandalia 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medicalodges Wichita 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spindrift Beverage Co. 184 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rand-Whitney Container LLC, Agrand & Greenwood 184 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Hydrogen - Natick 184 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanofi Genzyme 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : BOS5 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BOS5 1,076 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rentals Unlimited 743 FTE
CITY-NEAR New England Sinai Hospital 433 FTE
NAT-TCR 2024 Coborn's Huron -SD 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 079 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Joe Piper, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bi-Metallix Vishay Dale Electronics 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE ATI Huntsville Operations 184 FTE
NAT-SIZE Andersen Commercial Plumbing 184 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2006 Coborn's Little Falls 184 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3009 Cash Wise Waite Park 184 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.