Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Idaho

Copper Springs Senior Living

Meridian, ID · ~63 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Copper Springs Senior Living runs at 578% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Copper Springs Senior Living: 22.0 TCR = 578% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Copper Springs Senior Living safety composite

Copper Springs Senior Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−32.9

2016→2021

Copper Springs Senior Living injury rate improved

Copper Springs Senior Living's TCR fell 32.9 from 34.9 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 34.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=34.9 · 2017=21.8 · 2018=25.8 · 2019=17.9 · 2020=29.3 · 2021=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Meridian, ID ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 22.0 · 578% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #34/36
  • PHOTO Fox Hollow Senior Li…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fox Hollow Senior Living Community (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

Copper Springs Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Copper Springs Senior Living averages 22.0 TCR (578% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Copper Springs Senior Living TCR series: 2016=34.9 · 2017=21.8 · 2018=25.8 · 2019=17.9 · 2020=29.3 · 2021=2 · BLS 3.8

Where Copper Springs Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 36 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Idaho.

Copper Springs Senior Living (63 employees, TCR 22.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Copper Springs Senior Living
Copper Springs Senior Living (63 employees, TCR 22.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Copper Springs Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 29.3 26.0 6 12 0
2019 17.9 3.6 10 0 0
2018 25.8 12.9 14 0 0
2017 21.8 10.9 11 1 0
2016 34.9 34.9 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · ID · Meridian

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 217 employers in Meridian, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fox Hollow Senior Living Community 21.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Residence at Selleck's Woods 21.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY PROVIDENCE OPERATION LLC 22.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auberge at Brookfield 21.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE L&L Farm 1 - Grand View 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE L&L Ranches Idaho Nevada Utah 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE NNAC, Inc. 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Truss Company, Inc. 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jacksons Food Stores 2,110 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scentsy Meridian 1,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAP Meridian, ID 820 FTE
CITY-NEAR Field Sales West 787 FTE
NAT-TCR Sierra Forest Products 22.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZGJC 22.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Denton County Movers 22.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Structural Repair Department 22.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Community Coffee - Houston Sales 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE LFC Industries 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE SeniorLife Altoona, Inc 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE SUNNYVALE VW B&B Saab 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.