Blood banks · Arizona

Cordblood Registry

Tucson, AZ · ~208 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cordblood Registry runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Blood banks workplace, earning a grade B.

Cordblood Registry: 2.5 TCR = 64% of Blood banks BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cordblood Registry safety composite

Cordblood Registry scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cordblood Registry held a steady TCR band

Cordblood Registry's TCR held near 0.1 from 2.4 in 2023 to 2.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=2.4 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621991 · Tucson, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 64% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #21/54
  • PHOTO Indianapolis-North P…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~208 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Indianapolis-North Post, IN - Biomat (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Cordblood Registry in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cordblood Registry averages 2.5 TCR (64% of the Blood banks BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cordblood Registry TCR series: 2023=2.4 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Cordblood Registry falls in its industry

1,713 Blood banks establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 54 Blood banks employers in Arizona.

Cordblood Registry (208 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cordblood Registry
Cordblood Registry (208 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Cordblood Registry has more employees than the Blood banks median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 1.0 3 2 0
2023 2.4 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621991 · AZ · Tucson

1,713 Blood banks employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Indianapolis-North Post, IN - Biomat 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR INTERR-OPI-TERRE HAUTE 515 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Springfield 10285 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meridian MS-18th Ave-BIO 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Arizona Water Company 208 FTE
STATE-SIZE 75th Ave 208 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0935 - Flagstaff 208 FTE
STATE-SIZE 660-00669 208 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Quality Industries of America 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Fernco Inc 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Brentwood Industries 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Montana Waste System 4870 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE George P Johnson San Francisco 208 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thompson Dallas 208 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regal Rexnord (Falk) 208 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Food Stores 6310 208 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.