Cable splicing (except electrical or fiber optic) · Missouri

Core Communications

North Kansas City, MO · ~25 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Core Communications runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cable splicing (except electrical or fiber optic) workplace, earning a grade A.

Core Communications: 0.5 TCR = 17% of Cable splicing (except electrical or fiber optic) BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Core Communications safety composite

Core Communications scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2024

Core Communications injury rate improved

Core Communications's TCR fell 3.8 from 3.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · North Kansas City, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/30
  • PHOTO Bigge Crane and Rigg…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bigge Crane and Rigging Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Core Communications in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Core Communications averages 0.5 TCR (17% of the Cable splicing (except electrical or fiber optic) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Core Communications TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Core Communications falls in its industry

1,634 Cable splicing (except electri establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 30 Cable splicing (except electri employers in Missouri.

Core Communications (25 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Core Communications
Core Communications (25 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Core Communications has fewer employees than the Cable splicing (except electrical or fib median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · MO · North Kansas City

1,634 Cable splicing (except electrical or fiber optic) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 113 employers in North Kansas City, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bigge Crane and Rigging Co. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brand Scaffold Services Inc. - Torrance Refinery 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apache - Ineos Styrolution 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pentagon Technologies Rio Rancho 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Knob Noster Pullet Farm 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Select Genetics MO Prairie View 006-0138-PV 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOXF-SEL-MONETT FIELD OFFICE' 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sandy Ridge Cotton Co. LLC 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Garney Holding Company 1,890 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harrah's Kansas City 747 FTE
CITY-NEAR PrimeTech International 405 FTE
CITY-NEAR NorthCare Hospice House 266 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR BioDevices 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR HAZSD01 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR HALCM01 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Light's Welding Inc 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverside 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store #65 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Redner's Quick Shoppe Tuckerton 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.