General-line groceries merchant wholesalers · Georgia

Core-Mark International - Atlanta Division

Atlanta, GA · ~195 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Core-Mark International - Atlanta Division runs at 347% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General-line groceries merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Core-Mark International - Atlanta Division: 7.6 TCR = 347% of General-line groceries merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Core-Mark International - Atlanta Division safety composite

Core-Mark International - Atlanta Division scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−126.8

2016→2021

Core-Mark International - Atlanta Division injury rate improved

Core-Mark International - Atlanta Division's TCR fell 126.8 from 131.7 in 2016 to 4.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 131.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=131.7 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=9.5 · 2021=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424410 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 347% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #33/51
  • PHOTO Restaurant Depot 452
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 81 inj
  • SIZE ~195 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Restaurant Depot 452 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Core-Mark International - Atlanta Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Core-Mark International - Atlanta Division averages 7.6 TCR (347% of the General-line groceries merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Core-Mark International - Atlanta Division TCR series: 2016=131.7 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=9.5 · 2021=4.9 · BLS 2.2

Where Core-Mark International - Atlanta Division falls in its industry

1,651 General-line groceries merchan establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 51 General-line groceries merchan employers in Georgia.

Core-Mark International - Atlanta Division (195 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Core-Mark International - Atlanta Division
Core-Mark International - Atlanta Division (195 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Core-Mark International - Atlanta Division has more employees than the General-line groceries merchant wholesal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.9 4.2 7 0 0
2019 9.5 6.3 18 0 0
2018 9.3 5.0 17 0 0
2017 6.8 6.8 12 0 0
2016 131.7 112.2 27 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424410 · GA · Atlanta

1,651 General-line groceries merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Restaurant Depot 452 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Foodservice Caro Foods - 0635 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Performance Pacific NW - 1017 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elkton Distribution Center 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE THE SCRUGGS COMPANY 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hoshizaki America - GFN 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE Suhner Mfg., Inc. 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lasseter Tractor Company Inc 195 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Cambridge 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LFC Industries 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia Steel INC 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Equipment Solutions 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chromaflo - Ashtabula 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE MI Distribution 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dickinson Frozen Foods Sugar City 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ssa Cfs 3 195 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.