Electricity and electrical signal measuring instruments manufacturing · Pennsylvania

CoreStar International Corporation

Irwin, PA · ~28 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CoreStar International Corporation runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electricity and electrical signal measuring instruments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

CoreStar International Corporation: 1.9 TCR = 58% of Electricity and electrical signal measuring instruments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CoreStar International Corporation safety composite

CoreStar International Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CoreStar International Corporation: 0.0 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

CoreStar International Corporation's TCR rose 3.4 from 0.0 in 2018 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334515 · Irwin, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO NovaTech
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NovaTech (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

CoreStar International Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CoreStar International Corporation averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Electricity and electrical signal measuring instruments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CoreStar International Corporation TCR series: 2018=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where CoreStar International Corporation falls in its industry

125 Electricity and electrical sig establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Electricity and electrical sig employers in Pennsylvania.

CoreStar International Corporation (28 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CoreStar International Corporation
CoreStar International Corporation (28 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9

CoreStar International Corporation has fewer employees than the Electricity and electrical signal measur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334515 · PA · Irwin

125 Electricity and electrical signal measuring instruments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 23 employers in Irwin, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NovaTech 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Humanetics Huron 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boston Semi Equipment LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AriesInd 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Masda Mushroom LLC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scenery Hill 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Production Fire and Safety LLC., DBA Ampro Strategic Alliance PA 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bethlehem Energy Center 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Nutrition Group 4,406 FTE
CITY-NEAR ATS 399 FTE
CITY-NEAR NDX ALBENSI 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR Motion Systems : Irwin 128 FTE
NAT-TCR Des Moines 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CENTRE 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hill Electric Company 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Seidl & Associates Inc., DBA Acadiana Brain Injury Center 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Walter E Smithe Furniture, Inc - Oak Brook 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jefferson City WTP 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kairos NW- Jackson Services 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tampa FL Windows 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.