Lettuce farming, field, bedding plant and seed production · Arizona

Coronation Peak Ranches, Inc.

Yuma, AZ · ~44 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coronation Peak Ranches, Inc. runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Lettuce farming, field, bedding plant and seed production workplace, earning a grade C.

Coronation Peak Ranches, Inc.: 4.5 TCR = 100% of Lettuce farming, field, bedding plant and seed production BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coronation Peak Ranches, Inc. safety composite

Coronation Peak Ranches, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Coronation Peak Ranches, Inc.: 3.0 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 8.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.33× in 2024

Coronation Peak Ranches, Inc.'s TCR rose 3.0 from 3.0 in 2018 to 6.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111219 · Yuma, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.5 · 100% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #8/18
  • PHOTO Sabor Farms
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sabor Farms (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Coronation Peak Ranches, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Coronation Peak Ranches, Inc. averages 4.5 TCR (100% of the Lettuce farming, field, bedding plant and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Coronation Peak Ranches, Inc. TCR series: 2018=3 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=5.7 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.9 · 2024=6 · BLS 4.5

Where Coronation Peak Ranches, Inc. falls in its industry

331 Lettuce farming, field, beddin establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 18 Lettuce farming, field, beddin employers in Arizona.

Coronation Peak Ranches, Inc. (44 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Coronation Peak Ranches, Inc.
Coronation Peak Ranches, Inc. (44 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Coronation Peak Ranches, Inc. has fewer employees than the Lettuce farming, field, bedding plant an median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 6.0 3 0 0
2023 5.9 5.9 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2020 5.7 5.7 5 0 0
2019 8.4 4.8 7 0 0
2018 3.0 2.5 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111219 · AZ · Yuma

331 Lettuce farming, field, bedding plant and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 274 employers in Yuma, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sabor Farms 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oceano Packing Company 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR HM Clause - Sun Prairie 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hundley Farms Inc. 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE AZ Alamo Ag Solutions, LLC 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sierra Vista Construction Office 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willcox Main Office 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prescott Service Center 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primetime Harvesting Inc 2,271 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothill Packing- Arizona 2,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yuma Regional Medical Center 1,757 FTE
CITY-NEAR PGM PACKING INC 1,423 FTE
NAT-TCR Cypress Inn 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Advantage Sales Company 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Accessories of Michigan 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Supply Chain Solutions LLC 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE EER, Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE F&K Construction 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zipco Contracting, Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACW Inc. 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.