For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential · North Carolina

Corporate Division

Charlotte, NC · ~57 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Corporate Division runs at 8% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential workplace, earning a grade A.

Corporate Division: 0.3 TCR = 8% of For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Corporate Division safety composite

Corporate Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2018→2024

Corporate Division injury rate improved

Corporate Division's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236117 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 8% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/17
  • PHOTO DSLD Homes
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DSLD Homes (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Corporate Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Corporate Division averages 0.3 TCR (8% of the For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Corporate Division TCR series: 2018=2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Corporate Division falls in its industry

341 For-sale builders (i.e., build establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 17 For-sale builders (i.e., build employers in North Carolina.

Corporate Division (57 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Corporate Division
Corporate Division (57 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Corporate Division has fewer employees than the For-sale builders (i.e., building on own median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236117 · NC · Charlotte

341 For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DSLD Homes 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PHW 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garman Builders, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PARDEE HOMES 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kirlin Builders 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cape Romain / McLean A Joint Venture 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Engineered Steel Products 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE TQM Roofing, Inc. 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Rampart Hydro Services, LP 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Extreme Fab Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR WAI Global 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Rapids Service Center 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Richmond BNSF AAW 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE CIMC Reefer Trailer, Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2024 - Victorville 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE PKM Steel Service 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.