Industrial building (except warehouses) construction · Texas

Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project Stage 3

Gregory, TX · ~2,776 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project Stage 3 runs at 9% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial building (except warehouses) construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project Stage 3: 0.3 TCR = 9% of Industrial building (except warehouses) construction BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project Stage 3 safety composite

Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project Stage 3 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project Stage 3 held a steady TCR band

Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project Stage 3's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.3 in 2023 to 0.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=0.3 · 2024=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Gregory, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 9% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #26/92
  • PHOTO 104916 - Novozymes P…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~2,776 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 104916 - Novozymes Project ASAP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project Stage 3 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project Stage 3 averages 0.3 TCR (9% of the Industrial building (except warehouses) construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project Stage 3 TCR series: 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.2 · BLS 2.9

Where Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project Stage 3 falls in its industry

924 Industrial building (except wa establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 92 Industrial building (except wa employers in Texas.

Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project Stage 3 (2,776 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project Stage 3
Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project Stage 3 (2,776 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project Stage 3 has more employees than the Industrial building (except warehouses) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.2 0.1 10 0 0
2023 0.3 0.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · TX · Gregory

924 Industrial building (except warehouses) construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 30 employers in Gregory, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 104916 - Novozymes Project ASAP 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8779-Ineos Green Lake 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MBA Energy & Industrial 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2845-BASF Freeport 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE MESQUITE (TXMES) 2,771 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4701-RRD 2,767 FTE
STATE-SIZE Select Energy Services, LLC 2,786 FTE
STATE-SIZE BSA Hospital LLC 2,790 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project 3,099 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project Phase 2 898 FTE
CITY-NEAR 103792 - GCGV Olefins Recovery Project 431 FTE
CITY-NEAR CCL O&M 408 FTE
NAT-TCR Jushi 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Phys Enterprise Svces 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR LeChase Construction Services, LLC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Caltrol, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Boston Scientific CRM 2,778 FTE
NAT-SIZE Macomb County 2,773 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orange Regional Medical 2,772 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairfax Assembly and Stamping 2,772 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.