Correctional institutions · Connecticut

Corrigan Radgowski Correction Center

Uncasville, CT · ~376 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Corrigan Radgowski Correction Center runs at 319% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Correctional institutions workplace, earning a grade F.

Corrigan Radgowski Correction Center: 10.2 TCR = 319% of Correctional institutions BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Corrigan Radgowski Correction Center safety composite

Corrigan Radgowski Correction Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Corrigan Radgowski Correction Center: 7.4 → 11.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 17.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.11× in 2024

Corrigan Radgowski Correction Center's TCR rose 4.0 from 7.4 in 2017 to 11.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 17.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Uncasville, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.2 · 319% of ind

  • DART 11.4 DART
  • RANK #14/19
  • PHOTO TCSO Dt Pre Trial Vi…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 229 inj
  • SIZE ~376 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TCSO Dt Pre Trial Visalia (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Corrigan Radgowski Correction Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Corrigan Radgowski Correction Center averages 10.2 TCR (319% of the Correctional institutions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Corrigan Radgowski Correction Center TCR series: 2017=7.4 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=9.3 · 2020=8.9 · 2021=9.7 · 2022=17.2 · 2023=10.3 · 2024=11.4 · BLS 3.2

Where Corrigan Radgowski Correction Center falls in its industry

482 Correctional institutions establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 19 Correctional institutions employers in Connecticut.

Corrigan Radgowski Correction Center (376 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Corrigan Radgowski Correction Center
Corrigan Radgowski Correction Center (376 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Corrigan Radgowski Correction Center has more employees than the Correctional institutions median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.4 11.4 30 5 0
2023 10.3 10.3 28 3 0
2022 17.2 17.2 43 5 0
2021 9.7 9.7 27 6 0
2020 8.9 7.2 27 5 0
2019 9.3 9.3 32 2 0
2018 7.7 7.7 24 2 0
2017 7.4 5.3 18 7 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · CT · Uncasville

482 Correctional institutions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 24 employers in Uncasville, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TCSO Dt Pre Trial Visalia 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northern Regional Jail & Correctional Facility 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR California Men's Colony 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Detention Center 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gems Sensors Plainville 377 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2854 375 FTE
STATE-SIZE Natchaug Hospital, Inc 377 FTE
STATE-SIZE University of Connecticut - Stamford Campus 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority 5,989 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mohegan Tribe of Indians of CT 620 FTE
CITY-NEAR Orchard Grove Specialty Care 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR Apple Rehab Uncasville 127 FTE
NAT-TCR Best Western Plus Novato Oaks Inn 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Legacy Frames 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Eagle Valley Children's Home 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dash Markets #230 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Care Center 376 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cosma Body Assembly Michigan 376 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advertising Specialty Institute 376 FTE
NAT-SIZE Select Specialty Hospital - Columbus, Inc. (SSH - Columbus - Grant) 376 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.