Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Louisiana

Cortec Manifold Systems

Port Allen, LA · ~52 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cortec Manifold Systems runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade A.

Cortec Manifold Systems: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cortec Manifold Systems safety composite

Cortec Manifold Systems scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cortec Manifold Systems held a steady TCR band

Cortec Manifold Systems's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Port Allen, LA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO Hanna Corporate
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hanna Corporate (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Cortec Manifold Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cortec Manifold Systems averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cortec Manifold Systems TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Cortec Manifold Systems falls in its industry

329 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Louisiana.

Cortec Manifold Systems (52 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cortec Manifold Systems
Cortec Manifold Systems (52 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Cortec Manifold Systems has fewer employees than the Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.1 1.5 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · LA · Port Allen

329 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 101 employers in Port Allen, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hanna Corporate 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cleveland-Cliffs Tubular Components - Columbus 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plymouth Tube Company 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilder 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Entergy Hammond 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Broussard 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE National Water Infrastructure 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boggs & Poole Contracting Group, Inc 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Turner at Pipe Fabrication Baton Rouge LA 545 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BTR9 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pipe Fabrication Baton Rouge LA 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Performance Contractors, Inc. - Fab Module Yard-Port Allen 348 FTE
NAT-TCR Louisiana-Pacific Roaring River 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR City/Suddath Relocation Systems, LLC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR R Construction Company 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Medic 97 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE RdF Corporation 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Curtiss-Wright Fleet Solutions 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Griggs Orchards, Inc 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mann Street Yard 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.