Distribution of Stone Material Related Construction Material · Florida

Cosentino Center Ft Lauderdale

Fort Lauderdale, FL · ~18 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cosentino Center Ft Lauderdale runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Distribution of Stone Material Related Construction Material workplace, earning a grade D.

Cosentino Center Ft Lauderdale: 4.2 TCR = 192% of Distribution of Stone Material Related Construction Material BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cosentino Center Ft Lauderdale safety composite

Cosentino Center Ft Lauderdale scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cosentino Center Ft Lauderdale held a steady TCR band

Cosentino Center Ft Lauderdale's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=15.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=9.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423320 · Fort Lauderdale, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 192% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/12
  • PHOTO Cosentino Center Hou…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~18 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cosentino Center Houston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Cosentino Center Ft Lauderdale in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cosentino Center Ft Lauderdale averages 4.2 TCR (192% of the Distribution of Stone Material Related Construction Material BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cosentino Center Ft Lauderdale TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=15.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=9.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Cosentino Center Ft Lauderdale falls in its industry

158 Distribution of Stone Material establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 12 Distribution of Stone Material employers in Florida.

Cosentino Center Ft Lauderdale (18 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cosentino Center Ft Lauderdale
Cosentino Center Ft Lauderdale (18 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Cosentino Center Ft Lauderdale has fewer employees than the Distribution of Stone Material Related median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 9.7 9.7 2 0 0
2022 4.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 15.3 10.2 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423320 · FL · Fort Lauderdale

158 Distribution of Stone Material Related Construction Material employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 374 employers in Fort Lauderdale, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cosentino Center Houston 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Style Access 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Virginia Tile Co. Kansas City 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stone-Mart Tampa 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE IMG Citrus Lake County 18 FTE
STATE-SIZE BLUEBERRY BUNCH FARM, LLC 18 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clermont Operations 18 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minto Westlake Sales Office 18 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spirit Airlines - FLL 3,426 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Long Term Care Inc 2,979 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Lauderdale (FLL) 2,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hotwire Communications - Cypress 953 FTE
NAT-TCR Segrest - Pet Source 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Earthwell Energy Services 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ochsner Medical Center - Kenner 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Berry Home Centers, Inc. 4.2 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.