Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating · California

Cosmic Plastics Inc

Valencia, CA · ~25 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cosmic Plastics Inc runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating workplace, earning a grade C.

Cosmic Plastics Inc: 2.9 TCR = 88% of Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cosmic Plastics Inc safety composite

Cosmic Plastics Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.1

2017→2024

Cosmic Plastics Inc injury rate improved

Cosmic Plastics Inc's TCR fell 12.1 from 12.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=12.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=11.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325211 · Valencia, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 88% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/30
  • PHOTO LANXESS Corporation
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LANXESS Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Cosmic Plastics Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cosmic Plastics Inc averages 2.9 TCR (88% of the Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cosmic Plastics Inc TCR series: 2017=12.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=11.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Cosmic Plastics Inc falls in its industry

644 Plastics and synthetic resins establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 30 Plastics and synthetic resins employers in California.

Cosmic Plastics Inc (25 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Cosmic Plastics Inc
Cosmic Plastics Inc (25 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Cosmic Plastics Inc has fewer employees than the Plastics and synthetic resins regenerati median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 11.2 11.2 0 3 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 12.1 12.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325211 · CA · Valencia

644 Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 186 employers in Valencia, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LANXESS Corporation 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kaneka Aerospace LLC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR StarPet 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR FPI -TX 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conservation Farms Ranches 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE GM Ag Services, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm Shop 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dougherty Brothers 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 62 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital 1,776 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boston Scientific Neuromodulation 1,455 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodward HRT Santa Clarita 726 FTE
NAT-TCR Messmer Mechanical, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Four Star Greenhouse, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR RLG - Ample 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Precision Coatings, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pillar Technologies 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Automotive Technology Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE La Quinta Inn & Suites Shreveport Airport 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Bridge Company - 422210 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.