Ladders, portable metal, manufacturing · Georgia

Cotterman Company - Georgia Division

Atlanta, GA · ~48 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cotterman Company - Georgia Division runs at 311% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ladders, portable metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Cotterman Company - Georgia Division: 10.3 TCR = 311% of Ladders, portable metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cotterman Company - Georgia Division safety composite

Cotterman Company - Georgia Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cotterman Company - Georgia Division: 7.1 → 15.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 18.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2024

Cotterman Company - Georgia Division's TCR rose 8.3 from 7.1 in 2016 to 15.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 18.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332999 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 311% of ind

  • DART 7.7 DART
  • RANK #16/17
  • PHOTO 2356_4302
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2356_4302 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Cotterman Company - Georgia Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cotterman Company - Georgia Division averages 10.3 TCR (311% of the Ladders, portable metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cotterman Company - Georgia Division TCR series: 2016=7.1 · 2017=13.3 · 2018=11.4 · 2019=0 · 2021=18.8 · 2022=7.7 · 2023=8.4 · 2024=15.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Cotterman Company - Georgia Division falls in its industry

827 Ladders, portable metal, manuf establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 17 Ladders, portable metal, manuf employers in Georgia.

Cotterman Company - Georgia Division (48 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cotterman Company - Georgia Division
Cotterman Company - Georgia Division (48 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Cotterman Company - Georgia Division has fewer employees than the Ladders, portable metal, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.4 7.7 8 0 0
2023 8.4 3.4 4 1 0
2022 7.7 7.7 5 0 0
2021 18.8 16.7 8 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 11.4 4.5 5 0 0
2017 13.3 2.2 4 2 0
2016 7.1 2.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332999 · GA · Atlanta

827 Ladders, portable metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2356_4302 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABW Technologies, Inc 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR C.A. Schroeder, Inc. / CASCO 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goetsch's Welding & Machine, Inc. 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE L&M Farms of Georgia, LLC 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant McIntosh Combine Cycle 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Airport Operating - 112 Lake Mirror Road Forest Park 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Fulton Operating 116675 Wills Road 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR DURANGO 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Jersey City 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Nova Carpentry, Inc. 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Equipment Corporation 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Albert City 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA Heat Treating, Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Invincible Furniture 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE ITC Operations-319 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.