DOs' (doctors of osteopathy, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Kansas

Cotton O'Neil Manhattan Clinic

Manhattan, KS · ~104 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cotton O'Neil Manhattan Clinic runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical DOs' (doctors of osteopathy, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

Cotton O'Neil Manhattan Clinic: 1.0 TCR = 27% of DOs' (doctors of osteopathy, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cotton O'Neil Manhattan Clinic safety composite

Cotton O'Neil Manhattan Clinic scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cotton O'Neil Manhattan Clinic: 0.0 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Cotton O'Neil Manhattan Clinic's TCR rose 2.1 from 0.0 in 2021 to 2.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Manhattan, KS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/20
  • PHOTO Oregon Specialty Group
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oregon Specialty Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Cotton O'Neil Manhattan Clinic in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cotton O'Neil Manhattan Clinic averages 1.0 TCR (27% of the DOs' (doctors of osteopathy, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cotton O'Neil Manhattan Clinic TCR series: 2021=0 · 2023=2.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Cotton O'Neil Manhattan Clinic falls in its industry

2,836 DOs' (doctors of osteopathy, e establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 20 DOs' (doctors of osteopathy, e employers in Kansas.

Cotton O'Neil Manhattan Clinic (104 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Cotton O'Neil Manhattan Clinic
Cotton O'Neil Manhattan Clinic (104 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Cotton O'Neil Manhattan Clinic has more employees than the DOs' (doctors of osteopathy, except ment median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.1 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · KS · Manhattan

2,836 DOs' (doctors of osteopathy, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 83 employers in Manhattan, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oregon Specialty Group 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR HealthStar Physicians of Hot Springs 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Her Health 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cotton O'Neil Asbury Clinic 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heartland Traffic Services 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE MAM 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Altium Packaging - Lenexa 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kocher+Beck USA, L.P. 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Manhattan 640 FTE
CITY-NEAR GTM Sportswear 553 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 35 465 FTE
CITY-NEAR KSWIC017 ASCENSION VIA CHRISTI MANHATTAN 461 FTE
NAT-TCR LPSCO 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Akron Bearing Co., Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Casa Pacifica 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lanham MD 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. (PC6701) 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westonka ISD #277-Mound Westonka High School 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ralph Camputaro and Son Excavating, Inc. 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cardinal Health At Home Jacksonville 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.