Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · California

Courier Services

Cypress, CA · ~53 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Courier Services runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade B.

Courier Services: 3.7 TCR = 58% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Courier Services safety composite

Courier Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2022→2023

Courier Services injury rate improved

Courier Services's TCR fell 3.1 from 5.3 in 2022 to 2.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=5.3 · 2023=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Cypress, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.7 · 58% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #66/710
  • PHOTO Peterson Logistics
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Peterson Logistics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Courier Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Courier Services averages 3.7 TCR (58% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Courier Services TCR series: 2022=5.3 · 2023=2.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Courier Services falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 710 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in California.

Courier Services (53 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Courier Services
Courier Services (53 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Courier Services has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2022 5.3 5.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CA · Cypress

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 65 employers in Cypress, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Peterson Logistics 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 500 Hudson Valley Avenue 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Houston Enjoy House 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DGE7 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE ARMM Logistics Corp 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE WMS Delivery 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sand Hill Hotel Management Cupertino, LLC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE 178 Carmel Mountain (San Diego) 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR B2B Staffing Services Inc 433 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA - Cypress 365 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0748 - CYPRESS CA WHSE 363 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles CA Branch 342 FTE
NAT-TCR U.S. Space & Rocket Center 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR AP Nonweiler Company 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mannix Family Market @ Veterans Road LLC 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Campus - Chapel 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nursing Home Facility 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morris Magnets 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE E & H Electric Supply (Pc4382) 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zapata Construction Boston 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.